Drugs
Helping
those who can’t help themselves
The
safe injection site in the downtown eastside must turn away those who, by
physical disability, cannot safely inject themselves. The result is needlessly
heightened risk of HIV and AIDs among those already disabled
By
Alex Tegart
On
January 3, 2003, Health Canada made an exemption under the Controlled Drugs and
Substances Act (CDSA) so that intravenous drug users would be legally permitted
to self-administer their drugs in a safe and controlled environment. Nine
months later, the supervised injection site, known as InSite, located on
Hastings Street East in Vancouver’s notorious Downtown Eastside, was
born.
InSite
is a pilot program implemented by the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and
the Portland Hotel Society. It is operated with the help of nurses, social and
public health workers, and local volunteers.
At
InSite, clients can show up to the supervised injection site with their drugs
and receive sterile needles to inject them in a clean and safe environment. The
problem is that users who can’t physically do the job alone can’t
get any assistance with injecting. Their only option is to use needles they
manage to scrounge up on the street, risking exposure to Hepatitis C, HIV,
overdose, and poor injection technique. Without a further exemption allowing
nurses to help those users who need help to inject their drugs, the site would
be considered illegal under the CDSA for doing so.
The
federal minister of health does have the power to get around this restriction
if there are certain conditions that he thinks could reduce harm associated
with injection drug use. These exemptions all have to be for scientific
research purposes. For example, as outlined in the exemption noted in Section
56 of the Act, trafficking of drugs is not permitted at the site.
“Trafficking” is a term not to be taken lightly. It can be defined
in variety of ways, such as to sell, give, transfer, transport, send, or
deliver the substance, to sell an authorization to obtain the substance, or
most importantly, in this case, to administer a substance.
Allowable
reasons for the minister to consider an exemption are whether a resulting
project would help minimize the risk to health, safety, and security of
research subjects, staff members, and local communities.
Helping
clients who can’t help themselves could be a good enough reason for the
minister to consider an exemption, but it hasn’t happened so far. Saving
users from unnecessary wounds inflicted by bad injecting techniques
shouldn’t be a crime.
But
matters become complicated when nurses take the needles into their own hands
and actually push the plunger for the clients. The idea of nurses injecting an
unknown substance into a client’s body exposes the nurses to a huge
liability that the clinic and the nurses would share.
A
similar site has operated in the past in a less formal setting in Vancouver. In
April 2003, a guerrilla site was organized at 327 Carrall Street in the
Downtown Eastside by the Coalition for Harm Reduction. The unsanctioned
supervised injection site was the precursor to InSite, now operating on East
Hastings. The coalition at this site was made up of health care practitioners
and several community-based groups who supported marginalized people in the
Downtown Eastside.
They
were responding to the municipal government’s failure to open a
supervised injection site as was promised in 2002. The site was overseen by a
registered nurse and volunteers who were trained in CPR, first aid, safer
injecting technique, and dealing with conflict.
Over
the 181-day period it was open, data was collected by Dr Thomas Kerr, Megan
Oleson, and Dr Evan Wood. Oleson was the registered nurse on site. There were
no rules that prohibited the sharing of drugs or assisting injections. The
volunteers at the site supervised over 3,000 injections until the site was
closed in October 2003 by the supervised injection site council. According to
the report, they had little financial support or support from local health-care
workers, and the volunteers were getting tired. By this time, InSite had opened
and the majority of volunteers from the Carrall Street location were employed
at InSite.
InSite
now serves approxi-mately 600 clients a day, which is about half of the
population of users in the Downtown Eastside. The site focuses on safe
injection technique education, the treatment of wounds and abscesses, addiction
counselling, withdrawal management, and opiate replacement therapy.
From
September 2004 to August 2005, there were 197 treated overdoses among 116
clients at the supervised injection site. None of them resulted in death.
Research on the site’s impact on the city and on issues surrounding
health in the Downtown Eastside are being conducted with the help of the BC
Centre For Excellence in HIV/AIDS.
In
September 2005, a study on injection drug users in the Downtown Eastside was
produced by Dr Wood and Dr Kerr. The researchers recruited intravenous drug
users from the Downtown Eastside over six-month intervals to evaluate the
relationship between intravenous drug users requiring help injecting and HIV
infection. Participants were given an interviewer-administered questionnaire
and were asked to provide blood samples. Results showed that users who needed
help injecting were more likely to share needles with other users. When sharing
the needles, the users were more likely to be exposed to HIV and Hepatitis C.
Out of the 1,013 users who participated in the study, 41.3% needed help
injecting during the time period of six months.
If
almost half of the participants in this study needed help with injecting,
it’s safe to say that a lot of users in the Downtown Eastside are not
getting the proper aid that they require.
The
solution to the problem is as simple as slightly changing the definition of the
one elusive term: “trafficking.” But with such slight alterations
come huge implications for the ethical and professional responsibilities of
health care practitioners and political leaders, and their obligations to their
professions, their constituencies, and to the downtown eastside population.
|